BUG #18731: The psql \d command does not exactly match but can be executed - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From PG Bug reporting form
Subject BUG #18731: The psql \d command does not exactly match but can be executed
Date
Msg-id 18731-1d54c3fe1171a9d5@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: BUG #18731: The psql \d command does not exactly match but can be executed
List pgsql-bugs
The following bug has been logged on the website:

Bug reference:      18731
Logged by:          Man Zeng
Email address:      zengman@halodbtech.com
PostgreSQL version: 16.6
Operating system:   centos-8
Description:

Hi everyone,

I accidentally found that the \d command in psql does not match exactly, but
it can be executed. Just like the demo below.

[postgres@iZuf6hwo0wgeev4dvua4csZ postgres]$ psql
psql (16.6)
Type "help" for help.

postgres=# \dxabcdef plpgsql
                 List of installed extensions
  Name   | Version |   Schema   |         Description          
---------+---------+------------+------------------------------
 plpgsql | 1.0     | pg_catalog | PL/pgSQL procedural language
(1 row)

postgres=# \dx plpgsql
                 List of installed extensions
  Name   | Version |   Schema   |         Description          
---------+---------+------------+------------------------------
 plpgsql | 1.0     | pg_catalog | PL/pgSQL procedural language
(1 row)

postgres=# \dxabcdef
                 List of installed extensions
  Name   | Version |   Schema   |         Description          
---------+---------+------------+------------------------------
 plpgsql | 1.0     | pg_catalog | PL/pgSQL procedural language
(1 row)

Then I looked at the code, taking \dxabcdef as an example, psql only cares
about the previous \dx, so you can enhance the "exec_command_d" to match
normally.
But I don't want to introduce a lot of string matching here to solve this
problem, maybe there is a better idea.
At the same time I'm not sure if this is a known problem or a bug.
I look forward to your reply.

Thanks,
Man Zeng


pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #18711: Attempting a connection with a database name longer than 63 characters now fails
Next
From: PG Bug reporting form
Date:
Subject: BUG #18732: Segfault in pgbench on max_connections starvation