Re: Incorrect allocation handling for cryptohash functions with OpenSSL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: Incorrect allocation handling for cryptohash functions with OpenSSL
Date
Msg-id 1870277b-9fd2-a19b-5797-1bb035a35cba@iki.fi
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Incorrect allocation handling for cryptohash functions with OpenSSL  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Incorrect allocation handling for cryptohash functions with OpenSSL  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 06/01/2021 13:42, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 03:13:50PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> At the same time, I have taken care of your comment from upthread to
>> return a failure if the caller passes NULL for the context, and
>> adjusted some comments.  What do you think of the attached?
> 
> I have looked again at this thread with a fresher mind and I did not
> see a problem with the previous patch, except some indentation
> issues.  So if there are no objections, I'd like to commit the
> attached.

Looks fine to me.

- Heikki



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "k.jamison@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: [Patch] Optimize dropping of relation buffers using dlist
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Incorrect allocation handling for cryptohash functions with OpenSSL