On 24.12.21 09:04, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> Still, as Fujii-san concerns, I'm afraid that some people may suffer
> the degradation the patch causes. I wonder it is acceptable to get
> back the previous behavior by exposing SEQ_LOG_VALS itself or a
> boolean to do that, as a 'not-recommended-to-use' variable.
There is also the possibility of unlogged sequences if you want to avoid
the WAL logging and get higher performance.
