On Sep 17, 2024, at 15:03, Florents Tselai <florents.tselai@gmail.com> wrote:
> Fallback scenario: make this an extension, but in a first pass I didn’t find any convenient hooks.
> One has to create a whole new scanner, grammar etc.
Yeah, it got me thinking about the RFC-9535 JSONPath "Function Extension" feature[1], which allows users to add
functions.Would be cool to have a way to register jsonpath functions somehow, but I would imagine it’d need quite a bit
ofspecification similar to RFC-9535. Wouldn’t surprise me to see something like that appear in a future version of the
spec,with an interface something like CREATE OPERATOR.
I don’t have a strong feeling about what should be added that’s not in the spec; my main interest is not having to
constantlysync my port[2]. I’m already behind, and’t just been a couple months! 😂
Best,
David
[1]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9535.html#name-function-extensions
[2]: https://github.com/theory/sqljson
