Re: NATURAL JOINs - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: NATURAL JOINs
Date
Msg-id 18553.1223920394@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: NATURAL JOINs  ("Richard Broersma" <richard.broersma@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: NATURAL JOINs  ("regme please" <regmeplease@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
"Richard Broersma" <richard.broersma@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Reg Me Please <regmeplease@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Is there a way to know how a NATURAL JOIN is actually done?

> Here is what the manual says about natural joins:
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/queries-table-expressions.html#QUERIES-FROM

> Finally, NATURAL is a shorthand form of USING: it forms a USING list
> consisting of exactly those column names that appear in both input
> tables. As with USING, these columns appear only once in the output
> table.

The OP's case is actually giving a cartesian product, because the tables
don't have any column names in common.

You'd think this should be an error, but AFAICS the SQL spec requires it
to behave that way.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Jonah H. Harris"
Date:
Subject: Re: More schema design advice requested
Next
From: "Merlin Moncure"
Date:
Subject: Re: Chart of Accounts