Re: VACUUM (INTERRUPTIBLE)? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: VACUUM (INTERRUPTIBLE)?
Date
Msg-id 1853414.1599604625@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: VACUUM (INTERRUPTIBLE)?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: VACUUM (INTERRUPTIBLE)?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> So it doesn't seem that useful to not make manual analyze interruptible?

I find the main attraction of this idea is that instead of saying
"autovacuum/autoanalyze have these magic behaviors", we can say
"autovacuum/autoanalyze use option FOO".  So whatever behavior
autoanalyze has today, we should make available to manual analyze,
without quibbling too hard over how much of a use-case there is.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: More aggressive vacuuming of temporary tables
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: default partition and concurrent attach partition