Lee Hachadoorian <lee.hachadoorian@gmail.com> writes:
> My database is encoded UTF8. I recently was uploading (via COPY) some
> census data which included place names with �, �, �, and other such
> characters. The upload choked on the Latin characters. Following the
> docs, I was able to fix this with:
> SET CLIENT_ENCODING TO 'LATIN1';
> COPY table FROM 'filename';
> After which I
> SET CLIENT_ENCODING TO 'UTF8';
> I typically use COPY FROM to bulk load data. My question is, is there
> any disadvantage to setting the default client_encoding as LATIN1? I
> expect to never be dealing with Asian languages, or most of the other
> LATINx languages. If I ever try to COPY FROM data incompatible with
> LATIN1, the command will just choke, and I can pick an appropriate
> encoding and try again, right?
Uh, no. You can pretty much assume that LATIN1 will take any random
byte string; likewise for any other single-byte encoding. UTF8 as a
default is a bit safer because it's significantly more likely that it
will be able to detect non-UTF8 input.
regards, tom lane
