Re: Encrypted column - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Brian Mathis
Subject Re: Encrypted column
Date
Msg-id 183c528b0706050726v3214820fx6669d1e99bcfaaa@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Encrypted column  ("Marko Kreen" <markokr@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Encrypted column  ("Marko Kreen" <markokr@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 6/5/07, Marko Kreen <markokr@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/5/07, Tino Wildenhain <tino@wildenhain.de> wrote:
> > Ranieri Mazili schrieb:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I need to store users and passwords on a table and I want to store it
> > > encrypted, but I don't found documentation about it, how can I create a
> > > table with columns "user" and "password" with column "password"
> > > encrypted and how can I check if "user" and "password" are correct using
> > > a sql query ?
> >
> > Passwords are usually not encrypted but hashed instead. A common hash
> > function is available in postgres w/o any additional extension:
> >
> > md5()
> >
> > The rule is, if two hashes compare equal, then the original data must
> > be equal (yes, there are chances for collisions, but practically very
> > low. See also sha1 and friends in the pgcrypto contrib module)
>
> Both md5 and sha1 are bad for passwords, no salt and easy to
> bruteforce - due to the tiny amount of data in passwords.
>
> Proper ways is to use crypt() function from pgcrypto module.
> Due to historical accident is has bad name which hints at
> encryption, actually its only purpose is to hash passwords.
> Read more in pgcrypto doc.
>
> --
> marko
>

If you salt them yourself, there's no problem with md5 or sha1, and
they are arguably more secure than the old "crypt" call.  Most modern
linuxes use md5 for password storage.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Marko Kreen"
Date:
Subject: Re: Encrypted column
Next
From: Ron Johnson
Date:
Subject: Re: Encrypted column