bytea vs standard_conforming_strings - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Tom Lane
Subject bytea vs standard_conforming_strings
Date
Msg-id 1836.1161654209@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: bytea vs standard_conforming_strings  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-docs
The discussion of bytea in section 8.4,
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/datatype-binary.html
is obsolete because it assumes that standard_conforming_strings is
always OFF.  It could be very much simpler and shorter if
standard_conforming_strings were always ON, but that's not reality
either.  Anyone have an idea on how to rewrite it in a way that
isn't awkward, incomprehensible, or both?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.1.5 Release Notes
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Replication documentation addition