Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2019-10-04 01:34:48 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> D'oh ... bitshiftright() needs to do the zero-pad-fixup in both
>> code paths. Will fix it tomorrow.
> Does that suggest we shouldn't make the asserts active in the branches <
> 12?
No, it just means the previous patch was an incomplete fix. The
whole point of the asserts was to flush out cases where we weren't
padding correctly, and they just did that :-)
(Besides which, we discourage people from running with asserts on
in production, so I don't quite see what your concern is.)
regards, tom lane
