Re: [HACKERS] Addition of pg_dump --no-publications - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Addition of pg_dump --no-publications
Date
Msg-id 18294.1494599052@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Addition of pg_dump --no-publications  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> While it's consistent with surrounding code, I find the use of ints to
> express what is in essence a boolean condition puzzling.  Any
> insights?

IIRC, it's forced by the getopt_long API, particularly the way that
the long-options struct has to be declared.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Neha Khatri
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Time based lag tracking for logical replication
Next
From: Neha Khatri
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] If subscription to foreign table valid ?