Re: Out of memory with ODBC - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Relyea, Mike
Subject Re: Out of memory with ODBC
Date
Msg-id 1806D1F73FCB7F439F2C842EE0627B1806C26941@USA0300MS01.na.xerox.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Out of memory with ODBC  (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>)
Responses Re: Out of memory with ODBC  (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>)
List pgsql-general
> From: Richard Huxton [mailto:dev@archonet.com]
> > MessageContext: 1946198040 total in 258 blocks; 26624 free (43
> > chunks);
> > 1946171416 used
>
> Well, I don't have to be a developer to know that if there's
> a memory problem it's that big number starting 1946... that's
> the problem. If that's bytes, it's ~ 1.9GB
>
> Do you see a backend process growing to 2GB+ before failure?

I'm running PG 8.2.4 on WinXP.  I used the task manager (as a quick and
dirty utility) to watch the memory usage of the backend and it seemed to
peak around 1.2GB.  My server only has 1.5GB installed memory, so that
would seem to verify that the process does indeed run out of memory.

>
> A quick rummage through the source and I find this file,
> backend/utils/mmgr/README containing:
>
> MessageContext --- this context holds the current command
> message from the frontend, as well as any derived storage
> that need only live as long as the current message (for
> example, in simple-Query mode the parse and plan trees can
> live here).  This context will be reset, and any children
> deleted, at the top of each cycle of the outer loop of PostgresMain.
> This is kept separate from per-transaction and per-portal
> contexts because a query string might need to live either a
> longer or shorter time than any single transaction or portal.
>
> Hmm - I can't think how that could reach 1.9GB in size,
> especially since it has to be something different between a
> "raw" connection and how ODBC is doing things.
>
> Can you reproduce this immediately (connect, query, crash),
> or does the system have to run for a while first?

I rebooted my server (thankfully I don't have very many clients at all,
so that helps) and before anybody else connected to it, ran the query
and observed the same result.

This seems to be a problem with the ODBC driver?  How can I narrow that
down further?

Mike

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Akash Garg"
Date:
Subject: Re: DB errors
Next
From: Alan Hodgson
Date:
Subject: Re: DB errors