Re: NOTICE vs WARNING - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: NOTICE vs WARNING
Date
Msg-id 18068.1062540894@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: NOTICE vs WARNING  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> In fact, I like the criterion that a warning should be raised rather than
> a notice if the effect of the command deviates from what the command
> actually says.

Um.  If I construe that literally, then the notices about identifier
truncation need to be warnings.  I don't think I like that particular
answer.  But as long as you're not too rigid about it, this might be
a reasonable approach.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Larry Rosenman
Date:
Subject: Re: Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Win32 native port