Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Scott Carey
Subject Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics
Date
Msg-id 17E585DB-FF2F-4281-A5D1-7546829AE16C@richrelevance.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics  (Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Mar 9, 2010, at 4:39 PM, Scott Carey wrote:

>
> On Mar 8, 2010, at 11:00 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
>
> *  At least with CentOS 5.3 and thier xfs version (non-Redhat, CentOS extras) sparse random writes could almost hang
afile system.  They were VERY slow.  I have not tested since.  
>

Just to be clear, I mean random writes to a _sparse file_.

You can cause this condition with the 'fio' tool, which will by default allocate a file for write as a sparse file,
thenwrite to it.  If the whole thing is written to first, then random writes are fine.  Postgres only writes random
whenit overwrites a page, otherwise its always an append operation AFAIK. 

> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Scott Carey
Date:
Subject: Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics
Next
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics