Re: BUG #17972: Assert failed in pull_varattnos_walker() for view with subquery and security qual - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: BUG #17972: Assert failed in pull_varattnos_walker() for view with subquery and security qual
Date
Msg-id 1798406.1686686817@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to BUG #17972: Assert failed in pull_varattnos_walker() for view with subquery and security qual  (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-bugs
PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
> The following script:
> CREATE TABLE t1(a int);
> CREATE VIEW v1 WITH (security_barrier = true) AS SELECT a FROM t1;
> CREATE RULE v1_upd_rule AS ON UPDATE TO v1 DO INSTEAD UPDATE t1 SET a =
> NEW.a WHERE a = OLD.a;
> CREATE VIEW v2 WITH (security_barrier = true) AS SELECT a FROM v1 WHERE
> EXISTS (SELECT 1);
> UPDATE v2 SET a = 1;

> leads to a failed assertion with the stack trace:

Thanks for the report!

pull_varattnos is not at fault here.  The problem is that we missed
converting that SubLink to a SubPlan earlier, because hasSubLinks
wasn't set in the parent Query, so we never called SS_process_sublinks.
After some digging, I found the cause: rewriteRuleAction neglected to
check for SubLink nodes in the securityQuals of range table entries.

> `git bisect` for this anomaly pointed at 215b43cdc.

I think this is just accidental, probably an artifact of the
specific test case.  The oversight in rewriteRuleAction is as
old as the existence of RangeTblEntry.securityQuals, unless it
was impossible to write a SubLink in security quals before,
which I doubt.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: PG Bug reporting form
Date:
Subject: BUG #17972: Assert failed in pull_varattnos_walker() for view with subquery and security qual
Next
From: PG Bug reporting form
Date:
Subject: BUG #17973: Reinit of pgstats entry for dropped DB can break autovacuum daemon