BUG #17926: Segfault in SELECT - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From PG Bug reporting form
Subject BUG #17926: Segfault in SELECT
Date
Msg-id 17926-2967cc7019697fbe@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: BUG #17926: Segfault in SELECT
Re: BUG #17926: Segfault in SELECT
List pgsql-bugs
The following bug has been logged on the website:

Bug reference:      17926
Logged by:          Erik Oomen
Email address:      erik@nib4.nl
PostgreSQL version: 15.2
Operating system:   Debian11 bullseye arm64
Description:

We are facing an issue where a SELECT can cause a segfault, unfortunately
the backtrace is not useful:
Reading symbols from /lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libffi.so.7...
Reading symbols from
/root/.cache/debuginfod_client/b07109d62d007af8c6bffe3d76561e03711a1a6c/debuginfo...
0x0000ffff88d1311c in __GI_epoll_pwait (epfd=4, events=0xaaab109dd330,
maxevents=1, timeout=timeout@entry=-1, set=set@entry=0x0) at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/epoll_pwait.c:42
Download failed: Invalid argument.  Continuing without source file
./misc/../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/epoll_pwait.c.
42    ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/epoll_pwait.c: No such file or directory.
(gdb) c
Continuing.

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00010000017fedec in ?? ()
(gdb) bt
#0  0x00010000017fedec in ?? ()
#1  0x0000ffff017febd0 in ?? ()
#2  0x0000aaab10af7fa8 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)

The query uses a 3 partitions of a table where all fields have an brin
index.
This query will segfault:
SELECT count(*)
FROM dw
WHERE (dw.ts >= '2022-09-01' AND dw.ts <= '2022-10-30')
AND dw.source='type3' AND dw.customer='123.456';

The query should return 0 because the customer does not exist.
Removing the dw.customer or dw.source constraint will make the segfault not
occur.
Also using 'set enable_bitmapscan to off' will not trigger the segfault.

Details:
 PostgreSQL 15.2 (Debian 15.2-1.pgdg110+1) on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu,
compiled by gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, 64-bit


pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #17925: Incorrect select query result
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Logical Replica ReorderBuffer Size Accounting Issues