On 2021/10/04 15:18, Fujii Masao wrote:
>
>
> On 2021/08/26 1:39, Justin Pryzby wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 09:50:13AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> writes:
>>>> When I applied the patch to the master, I found that the table entries for
>>>> those function were added into the table for aclitem functions in the docs.
>>>> I think this is not valid position and needs to be moved to the proper one
>>>> (maybe the table for system catalog information functions?).
>>>
>>> You have to be very careful these days when applying stale patches to
>>> func.sgml --- there's enough duplicate boilerplate that "patch' can easily
>>> be fooled into dumping an addition into the wrong place. I doubt that
>>> the submitter meant the doc addition to go there.
>>
>> I suppose one solution to this is to use git format-patch -U11 or similar, at
>> least for doc/
>
> Yes. I moved the desriptions of the function into the table for
> system catalog information functions, and made the patch by using
> git diff -U6. Patch attached. Barring any objection, I'm thinking
> to commit it.
Pushed. Thanks!
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
