Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] postmaster.pid - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] postmaster.pid
Date
Msg-id 17906.1093533819@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] postmaster.pid  ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>)
List pgsql-patches
"Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> writes:
>> ISTM we should not ever queue any event for signal 0.

> That was my original intention, however Magnus thought it best just to
> let it be queued and subsequently ignored by the backend - thinking
> about it 15 minutes later I can't for the life of me think why that's
> any better...

Are there any error cases that we would miss detecting if it didn't go
that far?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] postmaster.pid
Next
From: Johannes Weberhofer
Date:
Subject: Backported the very useful oracle_compat.c from postgres 8.0 beta to 7.4.5