Re: multiple CREATE FUNCTION AS items for PLs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: multiple CREATE FUNCTION AS items for PLs
Date
Msg-id 17877.1355683460@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: multiple CREATE FUNCTION AS items for PLs  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: multiple CREATE FUNCTION AS items for PLs
List pgsql-hackers
Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
>> On further thought the function name should just be what it is defined 
>> in postgresql, like this

>> CREATE FUNCTION foo(a,b,c) AS $$
>>    def foo(a,b,c):

BTW, how well will that play with overloaded function names?  I don't
particularly care for saying that PL/Python fails if you overload a
function name across multiple schemas or argument lists ...
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: multiple CREATE FUNCTION AS items for PLs
Next
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: multiple CREATE FUNCTION AS items for PLs