Re: get_relation_stats_hook() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: get_relation_stats_hook()
Date
Msg-id 17759.1214499056@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: get_relation_stats_hook()  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: get_relation_stats_hook()  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> Surely you didn't mean ALL calls.  Please be more specific about what
>> you're proposing.

> The statistics relation STATRELATT is accessed in a few places in the
> planner. Since it is in the syscache it is accessed directly from there.
> I would like to add hooks so that stats data can come from somewhere
> else other than the syscache for tables, just as we can already do with
> get_relation_stats_hook().

Well, defining the hooks as replacing STATRELATT lookups seems the wrong
level of abstraction.  What if you want to insert stats that can't be
represented by the current pg_statistic definition?  Even if there's no
functional limitation, cons'ing up a dummy pg_statistic tuple seems the
hard way to do it --- we didn't define get_relation_info_hook as working
by supplying made-up catalog rows.  Furthermore, many of the interesting
cases that someone might want to hook into are code paths that don't
even try to look up a pg_statistic row because they know there won't be
one, such as two out of the three cases in examine_variable().

I think you need to move up a level, and perhaps refactor some of the
existing code to make it easier to inject made-up stats.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Planner creating ineffective plans on LEFT OUTER joins
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Planner creating ineffective plans on LEFT OUTER joins