Re: PostgresQL equivalent of NOCOUNT - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PostgresQL equivalent of NOCOUNT
Date
Msg-id 17715.997802217@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to PostgresQL equivalent of NOCOUNT  (Jochem van Dieten <jochemd@oli.tudelft.nl>)
List pgsql-general
Jochem van Dieten <jochemd@oli.tudelft.nl> writes:
> Does PostgresQL have some way to make update, insert and delete queries
> not return the number of affected rows? I know that in MS SQL one would
> use NOCOUNT for that.

Uh ... why?  Seems like a useless anti-feature.  Certainly suppressing
the count wouldn't save a noticeable number of cycles.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Jochem van Dieten
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgresQL equivalent of NOCOUNT
Next
From: "Christopher Masto"
Date:
Subject: Re: Problems with Blank space