Re: libpq object hooks - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: libpq object hooks
Date
Msg-id 17642.1210951805@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: libpq object hooks  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: libpq object hooks  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-patches
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> All of this is getting quite a long way from what was in the commitfest
> queue. Do we still want to try to get this in this cycle, or should it
> be marked returned to author for more work?

So far I think it still falls within the category of allowing the author
to revise his work.  I don't want to hold commitfest open waiting on
revisions of this patch, but as long as there's still other stuff being
worked through I don't see why they can't keep trying.

Just for the record, I would really like to close this fest before
PGCon starts.  We still have a couple more days to get it done.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq object hooks
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq object hooks