BUG #17610: Use of multiple composite types incompatible with record-typed function parameter - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From PG Bug reporting form
Subject BUG #17610: Use of multiple composite types incompatible with record-typed function parameter
Date
Msg-id 17610-fb1eef75bf6c2364@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: BUG #17610: Use of multiple composite types incompatible with record-typed function parameter
List pgsql-bugs
The following bug has been logged on the website:

Bug reference:      17610
Logged by:          Martin Jurča
Email address:      mjurca@centrum.cz
PostgreSQL version: 14.5
Operating system:   Linux, Debian 10.2.1-6, x86
Description:

The SQL code at the end of this bug report ends with the following error:

2022-09-08 10:09:02.173 GMT [174] ERROR:  type of parameter 1
(composite_type_2) does not match that when preparing the plan
(composite_type_1)
2022-09-08 10:09:02.173 GMT [174] CONTEXT:  PL/pgSQL function
polymorphic_fuction(record) line 6 at EXECUTE
2022-09-08 10:09:02.173 GMT [174] STATEMENT:  SELECT * FROM
polymorphic_fuction(
    CAST(ROW(2) AS composite_type_2)
    );
ERROR:  42804: type of parameter 1 (composite_type_2) does not match that
when preparing the plan (composite_type_1)
CONTEXT:  PL/pgSQL function polymorphic_fuction(record) line 6 at EXECUTE
LOCATION:  plpgsql_param_eval_generic_ro, pl_exec.c:6648

The expected output is:

 polymorphic_fuction 
---------------------
                   2
(1 row)

If I understand the documentation
(https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/plpgsql-implementation.html#PLPGSQL-PLAN-CACHING)
correctly, this should work. I noticed that the record type is not listed
among polymorphic types
(https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/extend-type-system.html#EXTEND-TYPES-POLYMORPHIC),
but PL/pgSQL documentation
(https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/plpgsql-overview.html#PLPGSQL-ARGS-RESULTS)
states that any composite type can be passed to a record parameter.

Full version info:

PostgreSQL 14.5 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6)
10.2.1 20210110, 64-bit

I am not sure if this is an error on my part, at the PostgreSQL server, or
in the documentation, but any help or clarification would be appreciated.

SQL code producing the error:

CREATE TYPE composite_type_1 AS (
  num int
);

CREATE TYPE composite_type_2 AS (
  num int
);

CREATE FUNCTION polymorphic_fuction(
  arg record
)
RETURNS int
LANGUAGE plpgsql
AS $$
DECLARE
  result_num int;
BEGIN
  -- Using either SELECT or EXECUTE has the same outcome (this I
understand).
  EXECUTE 'SELECT ($1).num'
  INTO STRICT result_num
  USING arg;
  RETURN result_num;
END;
$$;

SELECT * FROM polymorphic_fuction(
  CAST(ROW(1) AS composite_type_1)
);

SELECT * FROM polymorphic_fuction(
  CAST(ROW(2) AS composite_type_2)
);


pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres offset and limit bug
Next
From: Ming
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres offset and limit bug