Re: Return of INSTEAD rules - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Return of INSTEAD rules
Date
Msg-id 17533.1033707195@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Return of INSTEAD rules  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Return of INSTEAD rules  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I am confused how yours differs from mine.  I don't see how the last
> matching tagged query would not be from an INSTEAD rule.

You could have both INSTEAD and non-INSTEAD rules firing for the same
original query.  If the alphabetically-last rule is a non-INSTEAD rule,
then there's a difference.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Potential Large Performance Gain in WAL synching
Next
From: Oliver Elphick
Date:
Subject: Re: [SQL] [GENERAL] CURRENT_TIMESTAMP