Re: making the backend's json parser work in frontend code - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: making the backend's json parser work in frontend code
Date
Msg-id 17499.1580235378@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: making the backend's json parser work in frontend code  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: making the backend's json parser work in frontend code  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 11:35 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> 3. Some compilers still don't understand that elog(ERROR) doesn't
>> return, so you need a dummy return.  Perhaps pg_unreachable()
>> would do as well, but project style has been the dummy return for
>> a long time ... and I'm not entirely convinced by the assumption
>> that every compiler understands pg_unreachable(), anyway.

> Is the example of CreateDestReceiver() sufficient to show that this is
> not a problem in practice?

Dunno.  I don't see any warnings about that in the buildfarm, but
that's not a very large sample of non-gcc compilers.

Another angle here is that on non-gcc compilers, pg_unreachable()
is going to expand to an abort() call, which is likely to eat more
code space than a dummy "return 0".

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Is custom MemoryContext prohibited?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: making the backend's json parser work in frontend code