Re: small pg_basebackup display bug - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: small pg_basebackup display bug
Date
Msg-id 17451.1355682053@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: small pg_basebackup display bug  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: small pg_basebackup display bug
Re: small pg_basebackup display bug
List pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>> That would make such a truncation less frequent, and after all a truncated display is not
>> particular useful.

> Agreed - it's useful during testing, but not in a typical production
> use. It might actually be more useful if it's truncated in in the
> other end (keeping the last 30 instead of the first 30 chars)

+1 for truncating from the left.  I think pg_upgrade already does that
in its progress messages.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: multiple CREATE FUNCTION AS items for PLs
Next
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: multiple CREATE FUNCTION AS items for PLs