Re: small pg_basebackup display bug - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: small pg_basebackup display bug
Date
Msg-id 20121218003008.GA29144@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: small pg_basebackup display bug  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 01:20:53PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> >> That would make such a truncation less frequent, and after all a truncated display is not
> >> particular useful.
> 
> > Agreed - it's useful during testing, but not in a typical production
> > use. It might actually be more useful if it's truncated in in the
> > other end (keeping the last 30 instead of the first 30 chars)
> 
> +1 for truncating from the left.  I think pg_upgrade already does that
> in its progress messages.

Yes, it does in the current git tree.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: multiple CREATE FUNCTION AS items for PLs
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: multiple CREATE FUNCTION AS items for PLs