Re: [GENERAL] statement_timeout - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [GENERAL] statement_timeout
Date
Msg-id 17291.1164143521@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] statement_timeout  ("Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> So yes, autovacuum should ignore statement_timeout all of the time.

Actually, now that I look at it, this whole discussion was based on an
unfounded assumption.  StatementTimeout is only examined upon receipt
of a client command message in postgres.c, so autovac is already not
subject to it.  (The old contrib implementation would have been.)

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: quick review
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: quick review