> On 15 September 2013 at 18:42 Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 09/14/2013 10:27 PM, chris travers wrote:
>
> Well, you could fairly easily build it as an extension as a POC. The
> main point of the API this is built on was to allow for extensions.
>
> The logic changes might be a bit tricky. I'll be interested to see what
> you come up with.
>
> If we're going to do this we should make these handle arrays as well as
> objects.
Yes, arrays are necessary for my use case. I probably should have been explicit that I needed that too.
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
>
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
http://www.2ndquadrant.com
PostgreSQL Services, Training, and Support
