Re: pg_upgrade bugs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_upgrade bugs
Date
Msg-id 17160.1346644846@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade bugs  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade bugs  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Maybe, to reduce future backpatching pain, we could backpatch the change
> to exec_prog() API now that you have fixed the implementation?

I'm inclined to think this is a good idea, but keep in mind we're less
than four days from wrapping 9.2.0.  There's not a lot of margin for
error here.

At the same time, getting pg_upgrade to pass regression on Windows would
be a good thing, and ought to go a long way towards ameliorating worries
about this.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gurjeet Singh
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade test mods for Windows/Mingw
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol