Re: Skip temporary table schema name from explain-verbose output. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Skip temporary table schema name from explain-verbose output.
Date
Msg-id 171422.1627320809@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Skip temporary table schema name from explain-verbose output.  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 12:49 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I can't really see any situation in which it's important
>> to report the exact schema name of our own temp schema.

> It would actually be nice if there were some easy way of getting that
> for the rare situations in which there are problems.

I experimented with pushing the behavior into get_namespace_name,
and immediately ran into problems, for example

--- /home/postgres/pgsql/src/test/regress/expected/jsonb.out    2021-03-01 16:32
:13.348655633 -0500
+++ /home/postgres/pgsql/src/test/regress/results/jsonb.out     2021-07-26 13:10
:53.523540855 -0400
@@ -320,11 +320,9 @@
 where tablename = 'rows' and
       schemaname = pg_my_temp_schema()::regnamespace::text
 order by 1;
- attname |     histogram_bounds
----------+--------------------------
- x       | [1, 2, 3]
- y       | ["txt1", "txt2", "txt3"]
-(2 rows)
+ attname | histogram_bounds
+---------+------------------
+(0 rows)

 -- to_jsonb, timestamps
 select to_jsonb(timestamp '2014-05-28 12:22:35.614298');

What's happening here is that regnamespace_out is returning
'pg_temp' which doesn't match any name visible in pg_namespace.
So that would pretty clearly break user queries as well as
our own tests.  I'm afraid that the wholesale behavior change
I was imagining isn't going to work.  Probably we'd better stick
to doing something close to the v2 patch I posted.

I'm still suspicious of that logic in event_trigger.c, though.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Bossart, Nathan"
Date:
Subject: Re: Use WaitLatch for {pre, post}_auth_delay instead of pg_usleep
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Have I found an interval arithmetic bug?