Re: clang's static checker report. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: clang's static checker report.
Date
Msg-id 17135.1251395941@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: clang's static checker report.  (Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: clang's static checker report.
List pgsql-hackers
Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com> writes:
> (do you have to mark every function that calls ereport(ERROR) as one
> that exits?)

That would be an open-ended project, and probably in many cases wouldn't
change the clang report anyway.  I think it's only worth worrying about
the ones that we find will suppress some false positives.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alex Hunsaker
Date:
Subject: Re: clang's static checker report.
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: pretty print viewdefs