Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> No it doesn't. EOF will do fine. The source program doesn't
>> necessarily have to know anything about COPY, as long as its output is
>> in a format COPY can cope with (eg, tab-delimited).
> The current behavior seems quite strange and counter-intuitive. We
> might break the code for 1-2 people, but we will make it more
> predicable for everyone using it.
I don't think it's acceptable to simply remove the functionality.
If you wanted to argue about swapping the meanings of STDIN and -
(as defined by the patch) then we could debate about which way is
more consistent and whether it's worth breaking backwards compatibility
to improve consistency. I could probably be talked into supporting
that; as you say, we've done that before. But taking out a useful
behavior that has been there a long time, simply because you've decided
it's unintuitive, is not okay.
regards, tom lane
