Re: pg 8.1.3, AIX, huge box, painfully slow. - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg 8.1.3, AIX, huge box, painfully slow.
Date
Msg-id 17108.1144447375@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg 8.1.3, AIX, huge box, painfully slow.  ("Luke Lonergan" <llonergan@greenplum.com>)
Responses Re: pg 8.1.3, AIX, huge box, painfully slow.  ("Luke Lonergan" <llonergan@greenplum.com>)
List pgsql-performance
"Luke Lonergan" <llonergan@greenplum.com> writes:
> That said, I find typical memory bandwidth for the P4 in applications is
> limited at about 2GB/s.  See here for more detail:
> http://www.cs.virginia.edu/stream/standard/Bandwidth.html

> In fact, looking at the results there, the IBM 650m2 only gets 6GB/s
> on all 8 CPUs.  I wouldn't be surprised if the strange L3 cache
> architecture of the IBM 650 is holding it back from streaming memory
> access efficiently.

Given Gavin's latest report, I'm wondering how much the IBM slows down
when a spinlock operation is involved.  If the memory architecture isn't
good about supporting serialized access to memory, that gaudy sounding
bandwidth number might have little to do with PG's real-world behavior.
On the other hand, we already know that Xeons suck about as badly as
can be on that same measure; could the pSeries really be worse?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg 8.1.3, AIX, huge box, painfully slow.
Next
From: "Luke Lonergan"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg 8.1.3, AIX, huge box, painfully slow.