Re: listening addresses - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: listening addresses
Date
Msg-id 17020.1080139455@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: listening addresses  ("Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: listening addresses  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: listening addresses  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Both of these are not always correct - they might well have configured a
> listening address but we were unable to bind to it, although in that case
> a warning would have already been issued. To be strictly correct either we
> need to use a flag to distinguish the these cases, or we need an error
> message that contemplates both cases.

How about "no socket created for listening" or some such?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: "Andrew Dunstan"
Date:
Subject: Re: listening addresses
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: listening addresses