"Rocco Altier" <RoccoA@Routescape.com> writes:
> Please disregard this patch. I have a ton of lib%.exp and similar files
> created currently.
Yeah, that was one of the reasons I called it ugly :-(. I had put in an
"rm" step to get rid of lib%.so, you could probably fix the extraneous
.exp files similarly.
Alternatively we could look at expanding Makefile.shlib to provide %.so
pattern rules directly. My patch was more intended as proof of concept
than anything we necessarily wanted to apply as-is.
regards, tom lane
