Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Requiring recovery.signal or standby.signal when recovering with a backup_label - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bowen Shi
Subject Re: Requiring recovery.signal or standby.signal when recovering with a backup_label
Date
Msg-id 169743726774.94390.15300025617328185211.pgcf@coridan.postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Requiring recovery.signal or standby.signal when recovering with a backup_label  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world:  tested, passed
Implements feature:       tested, passed
Spec compliant:           tested, passed
Documentation:            tested, passed

It looks good to me.

I have reviewed the code and tested the patch with basic check-world test an pgbench test (metioned in
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/ZQtzcH2lvo8leXEr%40paquier.xyz#cc5ed83e0edc0b9a1c1305f08ff7a335).
 

Another reviewer has also approved it, so I change the status to RFC.

The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: Add support for AT LOCAL
Next
From: Konstantin Knizhnik
Date:
Subject: Re: Can concurrent create index concurrently block each other?