Re: BUG #7562: could not read block 0 in file "base/16385/16585": read only 0 of 8192 bytes - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: BUG #7562: could not read block 0 in file "base/16385/16585": read only 0 of 8192 bytes
Date
Msg-id 16858.1348179492@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #7562: could not read block 0 in file "base/16385/16585": read only 0 of 8192 bytes  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: BUG #7562: could not read block 0 in file "base/16385/16585": read only 0 of 8192 bytes  (Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de>)
List pgsql-bugs
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On Thursday, September 20, 2012 11:38:52 PM Tom Lane wrote:
>> Sure, but what about the heap?  The case I was speculating about was
>> that the heap had been truncated, but because of the corruption problem,
>> the index still had heap pointers in it.  We don't know what file 16585
>> is supposed to be.

> Wouldn't the truncation have created a completely new index relation?

If it were an actual TRUNCATE, yeah.  But it could be a case of VACUUM
truncating a now-empty table to zero blocks.

But nothing like this would explain the OP's report that corruption is
completely reproducible for him.  So I like your theory about hash index
use better.  We really oughta get some WAL support in there.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #7562: could not read block 0 in file "base/16385/16585": read only 0 of 8192 bytes
Next
From: Reinhard Max
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #7559: syslogger doesn't close stdout and stderr