Re: index problems (again) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: index problems (again)
Date
Msg-id 1685.1457369078@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: index problems (again)  (Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin@geoff.dj>)
Responses Re: index problems (again)  (Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin@geoff.dj>)
List pgsql-general
Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin@geoff.dj> writes:
> But as far as I can see, apart from the absolute extremes, the
> index-only scan is _always_ going to be quicker than the index+table
> scan.

Well, that is a different issue: what does the planner think of an
index-only scan as compared to a regular index scan.  I suspect that
it's pricing the IOS very high because a lot of the table is dirty
and therefore will have to be visited even in a nominally index-only
scan.  You might check whether the plan choice changes immediately
after a VACUUM of the table.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Geoff Winkless
Date:
Subject: Re: index problems (again)
Next
From: Karsten Hilbert
Date:
Subject: pg_restore man page question