Federico <cfederico87@gmail.com> writes:
> I think the tuple order would not be connected to the values, but be
> determined by the input order of the rows in the insert. So when using
> INSERT ... SELECT the tuple_order value would be determined by the
> output of the select, using the same logic as ROW_NUMBER.
We already rejected the idea that INSERT must preserve the order of
the incoming tuples. Please don't re-propose it with different
wording.
regards, tom lane