Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation)
Date
Msg-id 16769.1399407530@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation)  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 08:50:20PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
>>> Where are we on the default JSONB opclass change?

>> Not sure.  I'm for changing it, I think, but it wasn't at all clear
>> that we had consensus on that.  We did not have a proposed new name
>> for the opclass either ...

> Where are we on this question?

Stuck on the naming question.  I'd be willing to do the patch legwork
if we had a consensus (or even a proposal) for what to rename the
current jsonb_ops to.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Wanted: jsonb on-disk representation documentation
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Sending out a request for more buildfarm animals?