Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation)
Date
Msg-id 20140506201048.GI30817@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 08:50:20PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Where are we on the default JSONB opclass change?
> 
> Not sure.  I'm for changing it, I think, but it wasn't at all clear
> that we had consensus on that.  We did not have a proposed new name
> for the opclass either ...

Where are we on this question?

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + Everyone has their own god. +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Wanted: jsonb on-disk representation documentation
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: Sending out a request for more buildfarm animals?