Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation)
Date
Msg-id 20140506212020.GK30817@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation)  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May  6, 2014 at 04:18:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 08:50:20PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> >>> Where are we on the default JSONB opclass change?
> 
> >> Not sure.  I'm for changing it, I think, but it wasn't at all clear
> >> that we had consensus on that.  We did not have a proposed new name
> >> for the opclass either ...
> 
> > Where are we on this question?
> 
> Stuck on the naming question.  I'd be willing to do the patch legwork
> if we had a consensus (or even a proposal) for what to rename the
> current jsonb_ops to.

Well, then, we only have a few days to come up with a name.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + Everyone has their own god. +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pgindent run for 9.4
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: pgindent run for 9.4