Re: PL/pgSQL bug? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PL/pgSQL bug?
Date
Msg-id 16692.997711502@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PL/pgSQL bug?  (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>)
Responses Re: PL/pgSQL bug?
List pgsql-hackers
Jan Wieck <JanWieck@yahoo.com> writes:
>> that plpgsql's handling of command-counter changes is broken, but it
>> does not follow that sprinkling the code with SetQuerySnapshot is wise.

>     Why  do  you  blame  PL/pgSQL  for that? I don't see a single
>     reference to the command counter from the  PL/pgSQL  sources.
>     All it does is using SPI. So does "using SPI" by itself count
>     as "boken"?

Sorry: SPI is broken, not plpgsql.  Does that make you feel better?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL bug?
Next
From: mlw
Date:
Subject: Re: AW: Re: OID wraparound: summary and proposal