Re: libpq thread safety - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: libpq thread safety
Date
Msg-id 16662.1073838881@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to libpq thread safety  (Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>)
Responses Re: libpq thread safety  (Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>)
Re: libpq thread safety  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com> writes:
> But what about kerberos: I'm a bit reluctant to add a forth mutex: what 
> if kerberos calls gethostbyname or getpwuid internally?

Wouldn't help anyway, if some other part of the app also calls kerberos.
I think we should just state that kerberos isn't thread safe and it
isn't our problem.

For the same reason, the mutex in (eg) pqGethostbyname is an utter waste
of code space.  It guarantees nothing.  Furthermore, any machine that
claims to have a thread-safe libc will have either gethostbyname_r()
or a thread-safe implementation of gethostbyname().  There is no value
in our second-guessing this.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Mark Cave-Ayland"
Date:
Subject: Suggestions for analyze patch required...
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Suggestions for analyze patch required...