I wrote:
> Maybe so, but the parser is expected to put out a representation that
> will still be valid when the command is executed some time later.
Rereading this, I see I didn't make my point very clearly. The reason
this code doesn't belong in parser/ is that there's no prospect the
parser itself would ever use it. ObjectAddress is an execution-time
creature because we don't want utility statement representations to be
resolved to OID-level detail before they execute.
regards, tom lane
