BUG #16492: DROP VIEW IF EXISTS error - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From PG Bug reporting form
Subject BUG #16492: DROP VIEW IF EXISTS error
Date
Msg-id 16492-2f002961054fd4a8@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: BUG #16492: DROP VIEW IF EXISTS error
List pgsql-bugs
The following bug has been logged on the website:

Bug reference:      16492
Logged by:          Nina Marlow
Email address:      postgresql.2020@t-net.ruhr
PostgreSQL version: 12.3
Operating system:   Linux/Docker
Description:

When trying to use "DROP VIEW IF EXISTS x" while a table named "x" exists,
the DROP statement raises an "Error: x is not a view".

The documentation says about the "IF EXISTS" clause:

> Do not throw an error if the view does not exist. A notice is issued in
this case.

Imho, there shouldn't be an error if the view does not exist regardless of
whether or not a table with this name exists. The observed behavior is
contrary to the sense of the "IF EXISTS" clause as one would have to check
whether a table with the desired name exists before using "DROP VIEW IF
EXISTS". But then you could directly check whether or not the view itself
exists.

The error is, of course, absolutely correct for the "DROP VIEW" (without "IF
EXISTS") statement.

But when using "IF EXISTS", it can be a big problem if the statement is part
of a longer batch of statements because the batch operation stops on the
error.


pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: PG Bug reporting form
Date:
Subject: BUG #16491: PostgreSQL will not install unless a local account is used
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #16040: PL/PGSQL RETURN QUERY statement never uses a parallel plan