2009/12/25 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> I think maybe what we need here is a piece of syntax to indicate that a
>> specific parameter should be substituted after first being passed
>> through PQescapeStringConn.
>
> I agree that a global flag that changes the behavior of :foo is a
> seriously bad idea. Alternate syntax would be much better, but how
> exactly can we shoehorn that in? Maybe something like
> :!foo
there are two quoting styles, so we need two syntax. I proposed
:[var] and :{var} - for ident quoting and literal quoting.
Theoretically we could to use :(var) for bytea escaping. :!foo isn't
good idea. It is related to negation operator. Bracket or parenthesis
are good readable and far to some custom pg operators.
Regards
Pavel Stehule
> ie put some non-letter flags between the : and the variable name.
> It would obviously not work to use ::foo, but I think many other
> punctuation characters would be safe (would not conflict with any
> likely SQL usage). We could have a couple of different flags to
> signal whether you want single or double quoting of the variable
> value.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
