Re: Is this really really as designed or defined in some standard - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: Is this really really as designed or defined in some standard
Date
Msg-id 162867790809010035m5dc27151ie270b35a3e9c751d@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Is this really really as designed or defined in some standard  (Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Is this really really as designed or defined in some standard  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hello

2008/8/31 Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndquadrant.com>:
> It seems that we allow several function arguments to have same
> name (or is it label :)
>
> hannu=# create or replace function ff(a int, a int) returns int language
> plpgsql as $$begin return $1+$2; end;$$;
> CREATE FUNCTION
> hannu=# select ff(1,1);
>  ff
> ----
>  2
> (1 row)
>
> hannu=# select ff(1,2);
>  ff
> ----
>  3
> (1 row)
>
> hannu=# create or replace function ffa(a int, a int) returns int
> language plpgsql as $$begin return a + a; end;$$;
> CREATE FUNCTION
> hannu=# select ffa(1,2);
>  ffa
> -----
>   2
> (1 row)
>
> Is this defined by some standard or just an oversight ?
>

what is problem? You have two diferent functions. I don't see anything wrong.

Pavel

> ----------------------
> Hannu
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal