> So for a bit of useless syntactic sugar we should introduce conflicts with
> named parameters, conflicts with operators, introduce an un-sqlish syntax and
> remove a feature users have already made use of and introduce backwards
> compatibility issues for those users?
>
we talk only about "=>" symbol. What I googled, I never to find any
database that use AS for named params, and I don't really to create
next proprietary syntax (I would not to wait to ANSI). AS is usable,
but I don't think so it is good idea - it change sense of AS keyword
in SQL.
Oracle: fce (param => expr)
MSSQL: fce @param = expr
Firebird 2.0 allows defaults, but doesn't support named params
> At any point in this discussion has anyone explained why these labels would
> actually be a good idea?
>
it's allows smart libraries like SQL/XML
regards
Pavel Stehule
> --
> Gregory Stark
> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
> Ask me about EnterpriseDB's 24x7 Postgres support!
>
